The indoor season is here, and chances are you already have a couple of goals in mind for the next summer season. If you haven’t already started, now is the time to get a plan together to ensure you get the most out of your training. Depending on your schedule, family commitments or work constraints, there are two main training methods to choose from to improve your performance this winter.
Training for traditionalists - Periodisation
Periodisation can be defined as the systematic planning of training, and usually follows three phases; the base, build and peaking.
Your base phase, traditionally done in winter, is usually made up of slow and steady miles that help to build your aerobic fitness. Easy enough, right? Next comes the build phase, which is pretty self-explanatory; you can add more intensity to your base to help build muscular endurance and some anaerobic efforts in order to start working on your sprints and explosive power. Finally, the peak phase is designed to get you race ready, replicating race conditions and the subsequent demands on the body.
Periodisation is a tried and tested method for structuring your training, However, if you are keen to try something a little bit different, reverse periodisation may be the training method for you. Although the primary phase of reverse periodisation is focused on high effort work, contrary to common misconception reverse periodisation is not only about high-intensity efforts and doesn’t mean doing less work in the base phase.
Rebelling with the Reverse
Reverse periodisation usually starts with harder efforts before moving on to tempo work, challenging you to maintain high-intensity efforts. It later moves on to the endurance phase, and then peaking by doing low-intensity training with a mix of race efforts. This means you’re able to develop your speed and power first, and it teaches the body to maintain them for longer. Some people consider this method to work better for longer events, as the time when your training ‘peaks’ will be closer to your goal race.
Periodisation vs Reverse Periodisation - Which one is for you?
With traditional periodisation, you’re likely to see gradual improvements within your aerobic and physical conditioning whilst minimising your injury risk by building up a base first. Thanks to it’s low-intensity start, you’ll be able to build up a deep level of aerobic conditioning and form a great base to allow for more intense training later in the year.
However, starting out slow would mean that the majority of your base training would be done throughout the winter, where the days are shorter and your time is likely to be much more limited. Unless you’re training indoors (and happy to put in the hours on the trainer) hazardous weather conditions may limit your training time and quality. If you’re racing over long distances, you’ll need to add progressively longer rides into your build and peak phases, which may reduce the ability to fit in HIIT training later in the year, and therefore affecting your ability to improve on your power metrics.
By transitioning to a reverse periodisation plan, much of your HIIT training will be done within the winter months, reducing time spent on a turbo and allowing for longer rides once the weather improves come spring. This also means a lot of your FTP work is done early, so as your goal race approaches you’ll be able to tailor your training to best mimic race conditions.
Both periodisation methods are tried and tested, and athletes and coaches alike have followed both approaches. The method that works best for you will depend on how you make the most out of the time that you have available. Traditional periodisation may work better if you’ve taken a break from training after your summer season and you’re looking to introduce your training slowly, but if you’ve continued your training after the season ended, why not try the reversed method for something a little different?